The front entrance of the NSF headquarters in Alexandria, Virginia.
NSF
NSF ends fiscal year with more than $1 billion unspent
The National Science Foundation closed fiscal year 2026 with more than $1 billion in funding still unobligated following a sharp slowdown in research grantmaking. The agency obligated $6.4 billion in research funds this year, down from $8.3 billion in fiscal year 2025, according to the latest available data shared by Grant Witness – a decrease of about 23%. This funding was distributed between 6,218 awards, down from 8,647 last year and 10,937 in fiscal year 2024.
The New York Times reported that NSF withheld $1.4 billion in research funds in 2026, but the final figure could be different — an OMB apportionment approved in August estimated that NSF would carry $1.7 billion in unobligated research funding into fiscal year 2027.
While NSF has two years to spend its research appropriations, it typically doesn’t carry over such large shares of its annual budget. NSF spokesperson Mike England told the New York Times that the agency had “carried over funds to invest in agency priorities that are aligned with broader administration initiatives.” Earlier this year, Nature reported that NSF was withholding about $1 billion of its budget to fund the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy’s Grand Research Challenges initiative.
In contrast, the National Institutes of Health managed to spend its entire extramural research budget of around $34 billion this year, STAT reported, despite a slow start to its grantmaking.
Noam Ross, co-founder of Grant Witness and executive director at rOpenSci, told FYI that the differences in spending between agencies show “how important congressional restraints and directions in appropriations bills are towards being able to rein in the changes the administration is making.”
AI bills await further action in Congress
Congress headed for the campaign trail last week, leaving behind a number of AI-related bills for post-election consideration. Notably, Senate Democrats blocked a vote on a bill requiring states to consider making data centers pay for their power grid costs. The “Ratepayer Protection Act” had already passed in the House in September. Among newer bills, a bipartisan one would direct the National Institute of Standards and Technology to create national guidelines for controlling AI agents. House and Senate Democrats also introduced a bill that would create a new cabinet-level federal agency to regulate AI. Further along in the legislative process, the House Energy and Commerce Committee has advanced a “Chip Equip Act” bill barring the purchase of foreign semiconductor equipment. (Readers can use FYI’s Bill Tracker to follow these and other research-related bills)
On the White House side, President Trump issued an executive order directing federal agencies to replace the term “artificial intelligence” with “super intelligence” in communications, citing improved AI capabilities. Trump also posted a “self-policing” AI safety accord signed by industry leaders on his Truth Social network on Tuesday. Trump named Jay Clayton, the director of national intelligence, as his “AI Czar” on Sunday.
Second judge blocks $100,000 H-1B fee
A federal judge in California last week blocked the Trump administration’s $100,000 H-1B visa fee for failing to follow required rulemaking procedures. The ruling reinforces an earlier block from a case in Massachusetts, which found the six-figure fee amounted to an unauthorized tax. The Department of Homeland Security recently proposed a similar but different $103,265 fee on cap-subject H-1B petitions. The Association of American Universities and other higher education organizations have urged DHS to withdraw the proposal.
In other immigration policy news, DHS is appealing a Sept. 14 injunction blocking a rule that would end “duration of status” for F-1 students and J-1 exchange visitors. Separately, higher ed groups are also urging the State Department to withdraw proposed changes to the J-1 exchange visitor program that would make it easier for the government to cancel a participant’s visa. They argue that expanded termination authority would create uncertainty for prospective students and scholars
Also on our radar
A Russian drone strike on Ukraine’s National Academy of Sciences last week killed at least two people and injured others. The US National Academies condemned the attack.
Appropriators in both parties are considering how to counter President Donald Trump’s funding rescissions and protect NIH grants from political influence.
The US and 16 other nations endorsed the “Kyoto Vision for a Golden Age of Science” at a forum in Japan. The declaration calls for metascience and artificial intelligence to strengthen scientific discovery worldwide.
The White House will host the Science: A New Golden Age Summit on Thursday, a follow-on to the forum in Japan. OSTP did not respond to a request for details. DOE Under Secretary for Science Darío Gil said the event will build upon the July OSTP report on reshaping research funding.
DOE announced a funding opportunity of up to $400 million for basic research in fiscal year 2027, $100 million less than the expected level in 2026.
The DOE Office of Science Advisory Committee recently released roadmaps for quantum computing and the Genesis Mission federal AI initiative.
Conservative organizations are using open records requests to scrutinize climate researchers’ work that is potentially related to lawsuits, according to Politico.
House Science Committee Ranking Member Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) says DOE is obstructing her committee’s oversight duties by failing to provide the evaluations of awards DOE terminated last year and the names of officials involved.
From Physics Today: The postwar funding boom in US physics came to a crashing halt in the 60’s. The lessons learned may be helpful to today’s physicists.
Know of an opportunity for scientists to engage in science policy? Email us at fyi@aip.org.
Do you have a story to tell about how science policy is impacting you?
AIP’s research team is gathering first-hand accounts from scientists, engineers, students, and staff whose careers have been affected by policy and funding changes over the past year. Volunteers can submit their stories via this online form. Participants’ stories will be added to the Niels Bohr Library & Archives digital repository as searchable, citable records — with options for anonymity and a five-year embargo period. Read more about the initiative here.
Around the Web
News and views currently in circulation. Links do not imply endorsement.
The ruling put on hold DHS’s plan to cap international student stays at four years, but did not resolve the uncertainty facing international students considering studying in the US.